Zacharoula SmyrnaiouMenelaos Sotiriou, Sofoklis Sotiriou



What Does Scientific Theatre Do? Toward an Inquiry- Based and Semiotic Theory Through a Cultural Approach

pdf PDF


The 'Learning Science through theatre’ approach enables students to promote and reflect on the interaction between all types of cognitive systems and accomplish the cognitive transfer from Science to Art, in other words the transition from STEM to STEAM (Science, Technologies, Engineering, ARTS or ALL SUBJECTS, and Mathematics). This way students are enabled to develop their understanding of and engagement with both scientific and artistic ways of thinking through hands-on experimentation with real scientific data and development of art objects. This approach is compatible to Inquiry- based learning principles and enhances students’ understanding of scientific inquiry. Students build their understanding on scientific concepts applying and developing knowledge from the whole curriculum (multidisciplinary approach) and become acquainted with the concept of learning science creatively. A key finding in this approach is that students manage to realize and reflect on peripheral issues that influence science such as the timeline of the development of scientific concepts, the contemporary time, and the socio- cultural factors that have an impact on science. As a result, students are significantly enhanced in developing the necessary skills to make some assumptions regarding the future scientific developments and their societal impact as well. In general, the 'Learning Science through theatre’ approach follows a scientific approach while opening doors to experiencing new possibilities on several levels.


Scientific Theatre, Inquiry- based Learning, Cognitive systems, Art, Culture


[1] Smyrnaiou, Z.,& Dimitracopoulou, An Inquiry-based activities using a variety of Pedagogical tools. Computer based learning.

[2] Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2005, pp. 337-357.

[3] Smyrnaiou, Z., Sotiriou, M., Sotiriou, S. & Georgakopoulou, E. Multi- Semiotic systems in STEMS: Embodied Learning and Analogical Reasoning through a Grounded- Theory approach in theatrical performances. Journal of Research in STEM Education (submitted), 2017.

[4] De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of educational research, Vol. 68, No. 2, 1998, pp.179-201.

[5] Baker, W. P., Lang, M., & Lawson, A. E. Classroom management for successful student inquiry. The Clearing House, Vol. 75, No. 5, 2002, pp. 248-252.

[6] Craft, U. Unleashing creativity. Scientific American Mind, Vol.16, No. 1, 2005, pp. 16-23.

[7] Craft, A. Creativity and Education Futures. Changing Childhood and Youth in a Digital Age. 2011.

[8] Smyrnaiou Z., Sotiriou M., Georgakopoulou E., Papadopoulou Ο. (2016). Connecting Embodied Learning in educational practice to the realisation of science educational scenarios through performing arts, International Conference “Inspiring Science Education”, Athens 22-24 April, pp. 37-45.

[9] Smyrnaiou, Z., & Weil-Barais, A. Évaluation cognitive d'un logiciel de modélisation auprès d'élèves de college, 2005.

[10] Orgill, M. How Effective Is the Use of Analogies in Science Textbooks?. In Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks. pp. 79-99, 2013. Springer Netherlands.

[11] Gentner, D. Structure‐mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive science, Vol.7, No. 2, 1983, pp. 155-170.

[12] Masemann, Vandra Lea. "Culture and education." Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local, 1999, pp. 115-133.

[13] Arnove, R.F, Torres, A., Franz, S. Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. USA, 2013.

[14] Bikner- Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C., & Presmeg, N. Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education, Springer Netherlands: Imprint: Springer, 2015.

[15] Krippendorff, K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage, 2004

[16] Smith, J. A. (Ed.). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, Sage, 2015.

[17] Gobo, G.. The renaissance of qualitative methods. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2005.

[18] Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction publishers, 2009.

[19] Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. Learning in science: From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. International handbook of science education, 1(Part 1), 1998, pp. 3-25.

[20] Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International journal of science education, Vol.25, No. 6, 2033, pp. 671- 688.

Cite this paper

Zacharoula Smyrnaiou, Menelaos Sotiriou, Sofoklis Sotiriou. (2017) What Does Scientific Theatre Do? Toward an Inquiry- Based and Semiotic Theory Through a Cultural Approach. International Journal of Education and Learning Systems, 2, 47-58


Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0