REFERENCES
[1] Britz SS, Maltitz MJv., Application of the Hungarian Algorithm in Baseball Team Selection, Publishing University of the Free State, 2012. [1] Britz SS, Maltitz MJv., Application of the Hungarian Algorithm in Baseball Team Selection, Publishing University of the Free State, 2012.
[2] Thomas SJ, Swanik CB, Higginson JS, Kaminski TW, Swanik KA, Kelly Iv JD, et al. Neuromuscular and stiffness adaptations in division I collegiate baseball players, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2013, pp. 102-9.
[3] Kelly JD, Reason and magic in the country of baseball, The International Journal of the History of Sport, Vol. 28, No. 17, 2011, pp. 2491-505.
[4] Chen W-C, Johnson AL. The dynamics of performance space of Major League Baseball pitchers 1871–2006. Annals of Opereation Research, Vol. 181, No. 1, 2010, pp. 287-302.
[5] Alvarado M, Rendón AY., Nash equilibrium for collective strategic reasoning, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 3, No. 15, 2012, pp.12014-25.
[6] Galuszka A, Swierniak A., Non-cooperative game approach to multi-robot planning, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2005, pp. 359-67.
[7] Hubalovsky S., Modeling and Computer Simulation of Real Process – Solution of Mastermind Board Game, International Journal of Mathematics and Computer Simulation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2012, pp. 107-18.
[8] Yee A, Alvarado M., Methodology for the Modeling of Multi-Player Games, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers (part of CSCC '14), Santorini Island, Greece, July 17-21, 2014, pp. 353 - 8.
[9] Karpowicz MP., Nash equilibrium design and price-based coordination in hierarchical systems, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2012, pp. 951-69.
[10] Al-Rabadi AN., Qudits representations and computations of n-player many-valued quantum games, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 175, No. 1, 2006, pp. 691- 714.
[11] Chukwu EN, Cooperation and competition in modeling the dynamics of gross-domestic products of nations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 163, No. 2, 2005, pp. 991- 1021.
[12] Clempner J, Poznyak A., Convergence method, properties and computational complexity for Lyapunov games, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2011, pp. 349-61.
[13] Lewis HF, Sexton TR., Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure, Computer and Operations Research, Vol. 31, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1365-410.
[14] Kuhn HW., The Hungarian method for the assignment problem, Naval Res Logist Quart, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1955, pp. 83-97.
[15] Munkres J, Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems, Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 5, No.1, 1957, pp.32-8.
[16] Kuhn HW. A tale of three eras: The discovery and rediscovery of the Hungarian Method. European Journal of Operation Research. Vol. 219, No. 3, 2012, pp. 641-51.
[17] Bjarkman PC., Diamonds Around the Globe, The Encyclopedia of International Baseball. Westport, CT, Publishing Greenwood Press, 2005.
[18] Bradbury JC., The Baseball Economist: The Real Game Exposed, New York, NY, Publishing The Penguin Group, 2008.
[19] Dütting P, Henzinger M, Weber I., Sponsored search, market equilibria, and the Hungarian Method, Information Processing Letters, Vol. 113, No. 3, 2013, pp. 67-73.
[20] Goldberger J, Tassa T., A hierarchical clustering algorithm based on the Hungarian method, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 29, No. 11, 2008, pp. 1632-8.
[21] Chin-Jung H., Integrate the Hungarian Method and Genetic Algorithm to Solve the Shortest Distance Problem, Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA), 2012, pp. 496-9.
[22] Tamura S, Kodera Y, Taniguchi S, Yanase T., Feasibility of Hungarian Algorithm Based Scheduling, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC 2010) 2010, pp. 1185-90.
[23] Nash J., Non-Cooperative Games, The annals of Mathematics, Vol. 54, No. 2, 1951, pp. 286- 95.
[24] Miettinen K., Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Publishing Springer US, 1998.
[25] Pareto V., Cours d'économie politique. F Rouge Lausanne. 1896;1-2.
[26] Février P, Linnemer L,. Equilibrium selection: Payoff or risk dominance?: The case of the “weakest link”, Journal of Economic Behaviour Organization, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2006, pp. 164-81.
[27] Clark K, Kay S, Sefton M., When are Nash equilibria self-enforcing? An experimental analysis, International Journal of Game Theor, Vol. 29, No. 4,. 2001, pp. 495-515.
[28] Li J-F, Chen Y, Cui X-S,. The strategy based on game theory for cross-organizational business process reengineering in supply chain, W Trans on Comp, Vol. 7, No. 6, 2008, pp. 579-88.
[29] Gai L, Song Y., A Lazy Bureaucrat Scheduling Game, W Trans on Math, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2013, pp. 385 - 93.
[30] Roemer JE., Kantian Optimization, Social Ethos, and Pareto Efficiency, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No 1854 2012.
[31] Gale D, Shapley LS., College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1962, pp. 9-15.
[32] Lindsey GR, An Investigation of Strategies in Baseball, Journal of Operation Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1963, pp. 477-501.
[33] Williams T., Winning Strategies for Offense and Defense, Publishing Baseball’s Best, 2005. Arturo Yee et al.
|