B.Balakumar, P.Raviraj



Automatic MRI Gray Matter Brain Tumor Detection of Segmentation and Deep Brain Structures Based Segmentation Methodology

pdf PDF


In this paper a simple strategy for the automatic segmentation of tissues in magnetic resonance images of multispectral classification based mainly on minimum Euclidean distance is presented From a set of 3D images in the T1, T1 modalities with gadolinium contrast, T2 and FLAIR and its segmentation reference descriptors for each tissue type are obtained through the centroid of each class, which are used to classify new input images. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) offers the possibility of multimodality image acquisition, different imaging studies can be performed on the patient in the same slice position with little movement artifacts so images are acquired virtually registered. Multimodality MRI studies are usually performed to diagnose and characterize brain tumors and typically a set of 4 or more modalities are acquired. In the present work, a method based on multidimensional mathematical morphology is used to classify brain tissues for multimodality MRI comprising Four modalities, allowing for tumor image segmentation and characterization. The method also proposes a general view for image integration or fusion that allows for a targeted application of therapy.


Segmentation, Gray Matter, MRI, FLAIR, Euclidean Distance Classifier


[1]. Ahmed, M. N., Yamany, S. M., N. Mohamed, A. A Farag & T. Moriarty, 2002 . A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 21(3), 193-199.

[2].Tang, H., E. X. Wu, Q. Y. Ma, D .Gallagher, G. M. Perera & T. Zhuang, 2000 . MRI brain image segmentation by multi-resolution edge detection and region selection. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 24(6), 349-357.

[3].Tu, Z., & X. Bai, 2010 . Auto-context and its application to high-level vision tasks and 3d brain image segmentation. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 32(10), 1744- 1757.

[4].Shi, F., P. T. Yap, Y.Fan, J. H. Gilmore, W. Lin& D. Shen, 2010 . Construction of multi-regionmulti- reference atlases for neonatal brain MRI segmentation. Neuro image, 51(2), 684-693.

[5].West, J., J. B. M. Warntjes & P. Lundberg, 2012 . Novel whole brain segmentation and volume estimation using quantitative MRI. European radiology, 22(5), 998-1007.

[6].Lladó, X., A. Oliver, M. Cabezas, J. Freixenet, J. C. Vilanova, A. Quiles & À. Rovira, 2012. Segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI: a review of automated approaches. Information Sciences, 186(1), 164-185.

[7].Brain Development Cooperative Group.,2012. Total and regional brain volumes in a populationbased normative sample from 4 to 18 years: the NIH MRI study of normal brain development. Cerebral Cortex, 22(1), 1-12.

[8].Faria, A. V., A. Hoon, E. Stashinko, X.Li, H. Jiang, A. Mashayekh & S.Mori, 2011. Quantitative analysis of brain pathology based on MRI and brain atlases—applications for cerebral palsy. Neuro image, 54(3), 1854-1861.

[9].Cabezas, M., A. Oliver, X. Lladó, J. Freixenet & M. Bach Cuadra, 2011 . A review of atlas-based segmentation for magnetic resonance brain images. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 104(3), e158-e177.

[10].Li, L., M. Xie, J. Gao& X.Yue, 2014 . MRI Brain Segmentation Based on a Three-Dimensional Markov Random Field Model. In Unifying Electrical Engineering and Electronics Engineering (pp. 1233-1239). Springer New York.

[11].Marroquín, J. L., B. C. Vemuri, S. Botello, E. Calderon & A. Fernandez-Bouzas, 2002. An accurate and efficient Bayesian method for automatic segmentation of brain MRI. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 21(8), 934-945.

[12].Collins, D. L. & J. C. Pruessner, 2010. Towards accurate, automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and amygdala from MRI by augmenting ANIMAL with a template library and label fusion. Neuro image, 52(4), 1355-1366.

[13].Deng, W., W. Xiao, H. Deng & J.Liu, 2010, October. MRI brain tumor segmentation with region growing method based on the gradients and variances along and inside of the boundary curve. In Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), 2010 3rd International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 393-396). IEEE.

[14].Vijayakumar,BandAshishChaturvedi,2012."Tu mor Cut-Segmentation and Classification of MR Images using Texture Features and Feed Forward Neural Networks." European Journal of Scientific Research 85.3363-372.

[15].Vijayakumar,B.andAshishChaturvedi,2012. Automatic Brain Tumors Segmentation of MR Images using Fluid Vector Flow and Support Vector Machine." Research Journal of Information Technology 4

[16].Vijayakumar, B and Ashish Chaturvedi, 2013 "Brain Tumor in Three Dimenesional Magnetic Resonance Images and Concavity Analysis."International Journal of Computer Application 3.

[17].Vijayakumar, B. and Ashish Chaturvedi, 2013 "Effective Classification of Anaplastic Neoplasm in Huddling Stain Image by Fuzzy Clustering Method." International Journal of Scientific Research 3.

[18].Vijayakumar, B. and Ashish Chaturvedi,2013. "Abnormality segmentation and classification of brain MR images using Kernel based Support vector machine."Archive Des Science 66.4.

[19].B.Balakumar and P.Raviraj, 2013. “Abnormality Segmentation and Classification of Brain MR Images using Combined Edge,Texture Region Features and Radial basics Function” Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology,Vol.6,Issue21, pp 40404045, November,

Cite this paper

B.Balakumar, P.Raviraj. (2017) Automatic MRI Gray Matter Brain Tumor Detection of Segmentation and Deep Brain Structures Based Segmentation Methodology. International Journal of Medical Histology and Embryology, 1, 16-24


Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0