AUTHOR(S): Antonio Goncalves, Anacleto Correia
|
TITLE Anti-Bribery Quantitative Model. An approach based on pair-wise information System |
ABSTRACT Organizations strives to develop a relevant anti-bribery management system to comply with mandatory rules. To achieve an efficient model, managers must get an equilibrium among a pure rule oriented organization and an organizing with some degree of freedom, that allows people to choose. The difficulty is how to develop and manage efficiently anti-bribery system in an organization without putting at risk its day by day operation. Managers are concerned how to balance between inflexible control and a flexible way of people work on organization. The purpose of this document is to introduce a decision-making way of defining a context to establish an anti-bribery risk management system in accordance with the best practices. To address this matter, we will support our work in a theoretical framework for the analysis of human work and introduce anti-bribery as non-functional requirement (generic qualities of services) of organization information systems. |
KEYWORDS bribery, activity Theory, risk management, Pair-wise comparison |
REFERENCES [1] Ahrens, M. Risk Management: Protecting Your Integrity Abroad. Keeping good companies 62, 10 (2010), 597. [2] Bødker, S. Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design. L. Erlbaum, 1991. [3] Bolstad, B.M., Irizarry, R.A., Åstrand, M., and Speed, T.P. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 2 (2003), 185–193. [4] Deng, H. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. Fuzzy Systems Conference Proceedings, 1999. FUZZ-IEEE’99. 1999 IEEE International, IEEE (1999), 726–731. [5] Dietz, J. Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer, 2006. [6] Engeström, Y. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43, 7 (2000), 960– 974. [7] International Standards Organisation. ISO 31000 - Risk management. ISO 31000:2009 - Risk Management, 2009, 1. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/is o31000.htm. [8] Kaptelinin, V., Kuutti, K., and Bannon, L. Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. Context, (1995), 158–159. [9] Kaptelinin, V. and Nardi, B. Activity Theory in HCI: Fundamentals and Reflections. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 5, 1 (2012), 1–105. [10] Kwiesielewicz, M. and Van Uden, E. Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHP. Computers & Operations Research 31, 5 (2004), 713– 719. [11] Leitch, M. ISO 31000:2009--The new international standard on risk management. Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 30, 6 (2010), 887–892. [12] Leontiev, A. Psychology and the Language Learning Process. Elsevier Science Ltd, 1981. [13] Makowski, M. Mathematical modeling for coping with uncertainty and risk. Systems and Human Science–for Safety, Security and Dependability, (2005), 33– 54. [14] Ogryczak, W. Multiple criteria optimization and decisions under risk. Control and Cybernetics 31, 4 (2002), 975–1003. [15] Saaty, T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research 48, 1 (1990), 9–26. [16] Stapenhurst, F. and Langseth, P. The role of the public administration in fighting corruption. International Journal of Public Sector Management 10, 5 (1997), 311–330. [17] Vaidya, O.S. and Kumar, S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169, 2006, 1–29. [18] Vygotskii, L.S. and Cole, M. Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1978. [19] Whitman, M. and Mattord, H. Principles of Information Security. Cengage Learning, 2011. [20] Wierzbicki, A., Makowski, M., and Wessels, J. Model-based decision support methodology with environmental applications. Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000. |
Cite this paper Antonio Goncalves, Anacleto Correia. (2017) Anti-Bribery Quantitative Model. An approach based on pair-wise information System. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 46-56 |
|