oalogo2  

AUTHOR(S): 

Fragiskos Batzias, Stefanos Giakoumatos

 

TITLE

Fuzzy Multi-Objective Ranking of Scenarios/Technologies Aiming at Reduction of SOx Emissions by Ships

pdf PDF

ABSTRACT

This work deals with multiobjective ranking of scenarios/technologies aiming at reduction of SOx (Sulphur Oxides) emissions by ships. Initially, It is proved that there is a continuum between alternative scenarios/technologies rather than candidate distinct solutions, recognized as such on an a priori basis. Subsequently, a methodological framework under the form of an algorithmic procedure is presented, where a multicriteria tool is embedded by using six criteria, namely economic cost, environmental cost, reliability in performance, flexibility/adaptability, technology maturity, and technology perspective. The available scenarios/technologies have been categorized to form the following seven quasi-distinct alternatives within an a(i,j) 6×7 preference matrix: mixed hybrid fuel, A1; marine gas oil, A2; liquefied natural gas, A3; modified fuel cell, A4; dry scrubber technology, A5; hybrid wet scrubber based on NaOH, A6; hybrid wet scrubber based on MgO, A7. Fuzzy values were assigned to the matrix elements in fuzzy triangular form by means of a modified Delphi method to count for uncertainty. The matrix solution gives the ranking A3 > A1 > A2 > A7 > A6 > A5 > A4, where the symbol '>’ stands for 'better than’. Sensitivity/robustness analysis is performed, the results obtained and the assumptions made are discussed, remarks for specialization of multi-criteria analysis are presented, and directions for further research are suggested.

KEYWORDS

Multi-objective ranking, Air pollution, SOx emissions, Marine Industry, SECA zones

REFERENCES

[1] Ma H., Steernberg K., Riera-Palou X., Tait N.. “Well-to-wake energy and greenhouse gas analysis of SOx abatement options for the marine industry”, Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 17, 2012, pp. 301-308. [1] Ma H., Steernberg K., Riera-Palou X., Tait N.. “Well-to-wake energy and greenhouse gas analysis of SOx abatement options for the marine industry”, Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 17, 2012, pp. 301-308. 

[2] Batzias F.A., Marcoulaki E.C., Restructuring the keywords interface to enhance CAPE knowledge via an intelligent agent, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 829–834. 

[3] Notice for Low Sulphur “hybrid” fuel operation, Technical update No3, (March 2015), DNV-GL. 

[4] Maarten H., Den Boer E., “Scrubbers - An economic and ecological assessment”, NABU, Delft, March 2015, available on the website https://www.nabu.de/downloads/150312- Scrubbers.pdf. 

[5] Yang Z. L., et al., “Selection of techniques for reducing shipping NOx and SOx emissions”, Transportation Research Part D, Vol.17, 2012, pp. 478-486. 

[6] Livanos A., G., Theotokatos G., Pagonis D. N., “Techno-economic investigation of alternative propulsion plants for Ferries and RoRo ships”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 79, 2014, pp.640-651. 

[7] Ryan, M., “Fuel Cells for greener shipping”, Analyst view, Fuel Cell Today, 2012. 

[8] Mehmeti A., “Life cycle assessment of molten carbonate fuel cells: State of the art and strategies for the future”, Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 308, 2016, pp.97-108. 

[9] Alkaner S., Zhou P., “A comparative study on life cycle analysis of molten carbon fuel cells and diesel engines for marine application”, Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 158, 2006, pp. 188–199. 

[10] ABS, "Exhaust Gas Scrubber Systems Advisory, Status & Guidance". 

[11] Jiang L., Kronbak J., Christensen P., L., “Τhe costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil”, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 28, 2014, pp.19–27. 

[12] Tang X.J., et al., “Prediction model for desulphurization efficiency of onboard magnesiumbase Seawater scrubber”, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 76, 2014, pp. 98-104. 

[13] Article title “Low-sulphur fuel costs charging in”, October, 30th 2014, Green4Sea official website, http://www.green4sea.com/low-sulphur-fuel-costscharging-in/ 

[14] Bengtsson S., Fridell E., Andersson K., “Environmental assessment of two pathways towards the use of biofuels in shipping”, Energy Policy, Vol. 44, 2012, pp. 451–463. 

[15] Batzias F., Markoudakis Y., “Development of a local/wide area network (LAN-WAN) hybrid system for monitoring air pollution caused by oxides, particles, and secondary products”, Proc. 12th WSEAS Intern. Conf. on Energy, Environment, Ecosystems and Sustainable Development, A. Bulucea (Ed.), Venice, Italy, Jan. 2016, pp.111-121. 

[16] Batzias F., Sidiras D., Siontorou C., Bountri A., Politi D., “Fuzzy multicriteria ranking of waste materials to be used as adsorbents within an industrial ecology framework”, Proc. 10th WSEAS on Environment, Ecosystems and Development, S. Oprisan et al. (Eds.), Montreaux, Switzerland, Dec. 2012, pp. 236-241. 

[17] Batzias A., Batzias F., “Fuzzy Multicriteria Choice of instrumental methods for measuring physical quantities – application in the case of dielectric aluminium anodic oxide films”, Proc. of IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology, Vol. 3, May 2004, IMTC 04, pp. 2217-2222.

Cite this paper

Fragiskos Batzias, Stefanos Giakoumatos. (2016) Fuzzy Multi-Objective Ranking of Scenarios/Technologies Aiming at Reduction of SOx Emissions by Ships. International Journal of Environmental Science, 1, 309-316

 

cc.png
Copyright © 2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0