oalogo2  

AUTHOR(S):

Sanjay S. Sirsat, Manisha S. Sirsat

 

TITLE

A Validation of The Delone And Mclean Model On The Educational Information System Of The Maharashtra State (India)

pdf PDF

ABSTRACT

The advancement of information technology and high performance computing technology encourages every area such as in the present scenario; the public sector enterprises face huge competition at national and global level. Due to liberalization and globalization, more emphasis needs to be on quality, time line, innovation and customer orientation but it requires an accurate, fast, effective information system so that evaluation of information system is necessary with the aspect of organizational objectives. It does not only calculate the performance of hardware, software, computer network, and data but also achievement of all objectives of the enterprise. The use of information systems (IS) have been increasing in the last decade across the application architecture not only in private business enterprises, but also in public and government enterprises so that information systems success model can be considered in all contexts. This paper is focused on review of DeLone and McLean evaluation model, comparative analysis of original and updated model of DeLone and McLean and to validate information success of the Indian government UDISE system by applying the same model. In this paper the authors have successfully validated the model in the government of Maharashtra’s system

KEYWORDS

Information Success (IS), Management Information System (MIS), Reliability, Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE)

REFERENCES

[1] Ackoff, R.L., (1967). Management misinformation systems.Management Science 14, B-147B-156.

[2] Almutairi, H., and Subramanian, G. H. (2005).An empirical application of the Delone and Mclean model in the Kuwaiti private sector. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), 113122.

[3] Arun C. Mehta (2005 06). Elementary Education in India: Where do we stand. National University of Education planning and Administration, Volume

[4] Bailey, J. E., and Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530545.

[5] Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A., Munro, I., and Powell, P. (1996). The 3 D model of information systems success: The search for the dependent variable continues.Information Resource Management Journal, 9(4), 514.

[6] Bland J, Altman D. (1997). ¨Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha.¨ BMJ, 314-275, 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572

[7] Clemons. Eric K. and Steven O. Kimbrough, "Information Systems, Telecommunications, and their Effects on Industrial Organization."Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, December 1986.99-108.

[8] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318340.

[9] DeLone, W., and McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success : The Quest for Dependent Variables¨. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60-95

[10] DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. (2003). The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: A ten year update.Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9 30.

[11] Doll, W. J., and Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end user computing satisfaction.MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259274.

[12] George, D., and Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and Table 4: Results of Pearson's product-moment correlation and Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). USE US Sys_Q r-value=0.448831; p-value=1.57e-06 r-value= 0.5140292; p-value=2.042e-08 Info_Q r-value=0.3797176; p-value=6.467e-05 r-value=0.7259681; p-value <2.2e-16 Serv_Q r-value=0.4821027; p-value=1.916e-07 r-value=0.6763704; p-value=2.442e-15 NB r-value=0.8479972; p-value<2.2e-16 - S. S. Sirsat, M. S. Sirsat International Journal of Education and Learning Systems http://iaras.org/iaras/journals/ijels ISSN: 2367-8933 16 Volume 1, 2016 reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn& Bacon

[13] Ginzberg, M. J. (1981). "Early Diagnosis Of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results And Unanswered Questions."Management Science (27:4), pp 459-478

[14] Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., and Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19, 207228

[15] Graham, J. M. (2006). ¨Congeneric and (Essentially)Tau Equivalent Estimates of Score Reliability What They Are and How to Use Them¨. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 930-944, 10.1177/0013164406288165

[16] Hartley, V. L. (1928). "Transmission of Information". Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 7 , 535-563

[17] Heo, J. and Han, I.(2003). Performance measure of information systems (IS) in envolving computing environments: an empirical investigation.Information& Management, vol. 40, pp. 243-56

[18] Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004).Design science in information system research.MIS Quarterly, 28 (1), 75 105

[19] https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/car/car.p df

[20] https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/psych/ps ych.pdf

[21] Igersheim, R. H. (1976). "Managerial Response Io an Information System."AFIPS Conference Proceedings Vol. 45. National Computer Conference, 877-882

[22] Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of the DeloneMclean model of information system success. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 26(2), 827

[23] Lapiere, R.T., (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces 13, 230 237. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/2570339.

[24] Laudon, K and Loudon, J, (2006). Management Information Systems: managing the digital firm. ninth edition, Prentice hall.

[25] Lucas, Henry C. Jr., (1973) "A Descriptive Model of Information Systems in the Context of the Organization." Proceedings of the Wharton Conference on Research on Computers in Organizations. Data Base Winter, 27-36.

[26] Mason, R. O., (1978). "Measuring Information Output: A Communication Systems Approach. "Information Management, 1, 5. 219-234.

[27] Petter, S., DeLone, W., and McLean, E. (2008). ¨Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures,and interrelationships¨. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 236-263

[28] Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E.R. (2013). Information systems success: The quest for independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7-62.

[29] Reeves, C.A., Bednar, D.A., (1994). Defining quality: alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review 9, 419445.

[30] Ruel, H., Bondarouk, T., &Looise, J.K. (2004). E HRM: Innovation or irritation. A explorative empirical study in five large companies on web based HRM. Management Revue, 15(3), 364-380.

[31] Seddon, P. B., &Kiew, M. Y. (1994). A partial test and development of the Delone and Mclean model of Is success. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on information systems (ICIS 94), Vancouver.

[32] Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the Delone and Mclean model of Is success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240253.

[33] Sedera, D., Gable, G. and Chan, T. (2004). A factor and structural equation analysis of the enterprise systems success measurement model. In Proceedings of the Twenty Fifth International Conference on Information Systems (APPELGATE L, GALLIERS R and DEGROSS JI, Eds), p 449, Association for Information Systems, Washington, DC, USA.

[34] Shannon, C. E. and Warren, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press. Urbana. IL,

[35] Strong, D.M., Lee, Y.W., and Wang, R.Y. (1997). 10 Potholes in the road to information quality.IEEE Computer (August), 3846.

[36] Tavakol, M. and Dennick, R. (2011). ¨Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha.¨ International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53 55, ISSN: 2042-6372, DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

[37] Urbach, N. and Müller, B. (2012). The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success. Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting 1Our Digital Society, 1, Integrated Series in Information Systems 28

[38] www.dise.in

Cite this paper

Sanjay S. Sirsat, Manisha S. Sirsat. (2016) A Validation of The Delone And Mclean Model On The Educational Information System Of The Maharashtra State (India). International Journal of Education and Learning Systems, 1, 9-18

 

cc.png
Copyright © 2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0